Conservation & Sustainable Management

The Trouble with Trash. How waste is damaging our ocean

A sunny autumn day on the Island of Jersey and the beaches are thriving with people.  Today isn’t just about enjoying the coast.  Organised by Littlefeet Environmental – a non-profit that specializes in marine turtle conservation, ecology, and community development, 11 beaches and one underwater site across the Island are being cleaned by teams of volunteers.  “Every year tens of thousands of seabirds, marine mammals, and sea turtles are impacted by marine litter”, Littlefeet director Andy Farmer explains.  “We are trying to do our bit to take whatever we can out of the water to reduce this impact… Jersey does not see many sea turtles, but because of tidal action, currents, winds etc., our litter can impact on marine animals across the ocean”.

 

Littlefeet aren’t the only ones cleaning beaches this weekend.  Every year in September the International Coastal Cleanup, a collaborative initiative run by The Ocean Conservancy, enlists some 650,000 volunteers across the 90 countries to make the World a little cleaner.  In 2013 some 5.6 million kilograms of litter was removed from nearly 21,000 kilometres of coastline.  Some of the items collected are certainly unexpected, like dishwashers or voodoo dolls.  The top three items, however, are all too familiar.  Over 2 million cigarette butts, nearly 1.7 million food wrappers, and some 940,000 plastic beverage wrappers.  This is just the litter we can see.  The more we look at the ocean, the more we find, including in places we may not expect…

The full article was published and can be read in The Marine Professional – a publication of the Institute of Marine Engineering, Science & Technology (IMarEST)

Image: Duck Patrol by Matthew Kenwrick/Flickr (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

Conservation & Sustainable Management

Noise pollution in the Moray Firth a concern for dolphins

Most of us have been there.  You’re in a pub or a club trying to have a conversation but the music…it’s just too loud to hear what the other person is saying.  You shout louder and louder, the listener has their ear up close to your mouth but alas, the conversation doesn’t flow as it would do if you could both hear each other easily.  Now imagine that sound wasn’t just important for having a conversation, but for seeing.  And imagine that the loud noise preventing you from hearing properly wasn’t just in the pub, but occurred throughout your day-to-day activities.

Noise pollution is a problem for cetaceans because they use echolocation to ‘see’ and hear.  It’s quite a nifty technique because often the ocean is too murky or too dark for your eyes to see very far in, but sound can still travel.  Thanks to evolution, cetaceans have echolocation down to a fine art.  Not only can they figure out that something is there, but they can work out what it is.  But when it’s too noisy, the echolocation process can be disrupted and activities like hunting, navigation, and pod communication can become difficult to impossible.  Noise has even been linked to stress, and increased energy expenditure in our aquatic brethren.  One of the problems with figuring out just how noise pollution is affecting cetaceans is a lack of baseline data – to a large extent we don’t know the status of cetacean populations inhabiting different areas.  When we do get around to taking measurements of noise, we don’t have a good handle on how noisy different areas were in the first place to know if the noise has increased.  This lack of baseline data includes in conservation areas designated as important marine mammal habitat – just like the Moray Firth up in Scotland.

The Moray Firth is home to a well-studied population of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncates), but it also has strategic importance, forming a base for North Sea oil and gas exploration and potentially in the future, a base for an offshore wind farm.  Noise is likely to increase but to figure out by just how much Nathan Merchant of the University of Bath, alongside Enrico Pirotta, Tim Baron, and Paul Thompson of the University of Aberdeen decided to get some baseline data before developments begin.  Once that data is in place, they argue, more accurate correlations between noise and effects of marine mammals can be determined.

During the summer of 2012, Nathan and his team placed two underwater noise monitors – both in deep narrow channels popular with the dolphins for foraging, as well as prime shipping traffic routes.  They then monitored the noise on a cycle of 1 minute every 10 minutes and tied that data up with Automatic Identification System (AIS) ship-tracking data.  For the other 9 minutes recordings still took place, primarily to provide more analysis of noise events of interest.  And of course, this sound recordings also picked up the bottlenose dolphins as well as other marine mammals, but the team also deployed C-Pods – recorders dedicated for marine mammal noise – at the sites.  Conditions like rain and wind can also create noise in the Firth so meteorological data was also collected.

The acoustic data confirmed that the dolphins were using the two site quite heavily, with recordings of their clicks at both sites being made every day.  The two sites differed a fair bit in their baseline noise levels, with one generally much noisy than the other, with shipping traffic appeared to be the main source of noise pollution.  The researchers hypothesise that increase in noise levels at the already noisy site may be less damaging to the dolphins than increases at the quieter site, because the noisy site has already suffered noise-related habitat degradation to which the dolphins have already become accustomed.  Indeed the Moray Firth population size is showing signs of being stable, and is perhaps even increasing which is a positive sign.  However, the dolphin vocalizations overlapped both in frequency and amplitude with the shipping traffic.  This is concerning because it means that there is a higher risk of the dolphin’s vocalization being masked out by increases in shipping traffic.  Just how much shipping noise is too much is still unclear.

The paper is published in the journal Marine Pollution Bulletin and has been made open access.  You can read it here: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.10.058

There are also a couple videos up on YouTube where  you can listen to “short real-time clips” of the ship noise monitoring in the Moray Firth, accompanied by ship tracking data, underwater recorders, and time-lapse cameras.  Check them out here Ship noise monitoring in the Moray Firth – The Sutors and here Ship noise monitoring in the Moray Firth – Chanonry.

Image: Adult female Bottlenose Dolphin with two young at side, Inner Moray Firth, Scotland May 2005.  Photographer Peter Asprey/Wikipedia and cropped by Clayoquot/Wikipedia  (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Conservation & Sustainable Management

What did you say?

Most of us have been there.  You’re in a pub or a club trying to have a conversation but the music…it’s just too loud to hear what the other person is saying.  You shout louder and louder, the listener has their ear up close to your mouth but alas, the conversation doesn’t flow as it would do if you could both hear each other easily.  Now imagine that sound wasn’t just important for having a conversation, but for seeing.  And imagine that loud noise preventing you from hearing properly wasn’t just in the pub, but occurred throughout your day-to-day activities.

Noise pollution is a problem for cetaceans because they use echolocation to ‘see’ and hear.  It’s quite a nifty technique because often the ocean is too murky or too dark for your eyes to see very far in, but sound can still travel.  Thanks to evolution, cetaceans have echolocation down to a fine art.  Not only can they figure out that something is there, but they can work out what it is.  But when it’s too noisy, the echolocation process can be disrupted and activities like hunting, navigation, and pod communication can become difficult to impossible.  Noise has even been linked to stress, and increased energy expenditure in our aquatic brethren.  One of the problems with figuring out just how noise pollution is affecting cetaceans is a lack of baseline data – to a large extent we don’t know the status of cetacean populations inhabiting different areas.  When we do get around to taking measurements of noise, we don’t have a good handle on how noisy different areas were in the first place to know if the noise has increased.  This lack of baseline data includes in conservation areas designated as important marine mammal habitat – just like the Moray Firth up in Scotland.

The Moray Firth is home to a well-studied population of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncates), but it also has strategic importance, forming a base for North Sea oil and gas exploration and potentially in the future, a base for an offshore wind farm.  Noise is likely to increase but to figure out by just how much Nathan Merchant of the University of Bath, alongside Enrico Pirotta, Tim Baron, and Paul Thompson of the University of Aberdeen decided to get some baseline data before developments begin.  Once that data is in place, they argue, more accurate correlations between noise and effects of marine mammals can be determined.

During the summer of 2012, Nathan and his team placed two underwater noise monitors – both in deep narrow channels popular with the dolphins for foraging, as well as prime shipping traffic routes.  They then monitored the noise on a cycle of 1 minute every 10 minutes and tied that data up with Automatic Identification System (AIS) ship-tracking data.  For the other 9 minutes recordings still took place, primarily to provide more analysis of noise events of interest.  And of course, this sound recordings also picked up the bottlenose dolphins as well as other marine mammals, but the team also deployed C-Pods – recorders dedicated for marine mammal noise – at the sites.  Conditions like rain and wind can also create noise in the Firth so meteorological data was also collected.

The acoustic data confirmed that the dolphins were using the two site quite heavily, with recordings of their clicks at both sites being made every day.  The two sites differed a fair bit in their baseline noise levels, with one generally much noisy than the other, with shipping traffic appeared to be the main source of noise pollution.  The researchers hypothesise that increase in noise levels at the already noisy site may be less damaging to the dolphins than increases at the quieter site, because the noisy site has already suffered noise-related habitat degradation to which the dolphins have already become accustomed.  Indeed the Moray Firth population size is showing signs of being stable, and is perhaps even increasing which is a positive sign.  However, the dolphin vocalizations overlapped both in frequency and amplitude with the shipping traffic.  This is concerning because it means that there is a higher risk of the dolphin’s vocalization being masked out by increases in shipping traffic.  Just how much shipping noise is too much is still unclear.

The paper is published in the journal Marine Pollution Bulletin and has been made open access.  You can read it here: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.10.058

There are also a couple of videos up on YouTube where you can listen to “short real-time clips” of the ship noise monitoring in the Moray Firth, accompanied by ship tracking data, underwater recorders, and time-lapse cameras.  Check them out here Ship noise monitoring in the Moray Firth – The Sutors and here Ship noise monitoring in the Moray Firth – Chanonry

Image: Bottlenose dolphin breaching off the Moray Firth, Scotland.  Credit Ellis Lawrence/Flickr (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Conservation & Sustainable Management

Plastics are a sea turtle’s not so tasty treat

Well it seems its the season for posting about plastic pollution in our oceans.  Following on from my recent posts on pelagic fish consuming plastics and the ‘plastisphere‘ I bring you yet another impact of plastic pollution…this time on sea turtles.

Tommaso Campani from the University of Siena, Italy and colleagues have been busy looking at deceased  loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta ) stranded along the Tuscany coasts.  What they found was disturbing, but perhaps not unsurprising.  71% of the turtles  were found to have a total of 483  items of debris in their intestine, stomach, or oesophagus.  441 of those items were plastic, and primarily sheet-like plastic (think plastic bags).  Looking through the eyes of a loggerhead turtle, its perhaps easy to suggest that the high level of sheet-like plastic is likely to arise from the similarity of the plastic with jellyfish – a major prey item of the species.  Even the colour of plastic didn’t seem to deter these unfussy critters consuming the plastic.

Although the sample size was small (just 31 turtles), and ingestion of debris – particularly plastic – cannot be directly linked to their death, it does raise some questions about the disposal of litter…or rather lack thereof.

The paper has been published in the journal  ‘Marine Pollution Bulletin’.  Unfortunately it is not open access so you’ll need journal access (or to pay for access) to read it.

Image: Wondering what it is?  Yup… a plastic bag.  Credit Patrick Kelley Worldwide Photographer/Marine Photobank

Conservation & Sustainable Management, Ocean Ecosystems

Nitrification + warming waters = trouble for kelp

Nutrients.  Plants love them – it helps them grow big and strong.  You might think that an excess of nutrients in the waters of kelp forests would be a good thing for the kelp.  Well, not necessarily….

In high nutrient conditions, algal turf is able to out-compete kelp.  It quickly takes up any available space, and prevents new kelp growing.  It’s becoming a particular issue in areas such as southern Australia, where the kelp forests are known to be areas of high biodiversity. Stressors on any ecosystem rarely act totally independently, and there is one big stressor to the global ocean that has scientists particularly worried – rising carbon dioxide levels.

Laura Falkenberg and colleagues at the University of Adelaide, Australia sought out to discover if rising carbon dioxide and nutrient input interact with each other to impact algal turf growth.  Their experimental research revealed that increasing carbon dioxide and nutrient inputs together created faster growth in algal turf than either nutrient or carbon dioxide separately.  That’s not good news, because our carbon dioxide emissions don’t look like they are going to reduced significantly any time soon.

There is one possible glimmer of hope though.  The research indicated that if nutrient inputs are stopped, then the turf declines by some 75% – despite carbon dioxide levels remaining elevated.  Excessive nutrient input doesn’t just affect kelp forests – check out my post on Google+ just a few days ago on agricultural pollution impacts on the Great Barrier Reef.

The question is, are we able to tackle nutrient pollution more successfully than carbon emissions?
Image:  Gazing upward in a giant kelp forest. California, Channel Islands NMS. Credit NOAA Photo Library (CC BY 2.0)

Conservation & Sustainable Management

Welcome to The Plastisphere!

The what?  Well here’s how Dr Linda Amaral-Zettler and colleagues of the Marine Biological Laboratory in the USA describe it:

“The Plastisphere represents a little world of life that exists on the surface of plastic particles. This environment comes complete with predators and prey, organisms that photosynthesise to produce energy from light, (similar to plants on land), and even parasites and potentially disease-causing organisms harmful to invertebrates, fish and humans.”

Sounds…lovely.

According to a separate piece of research published back in 2010, despite increases in plastic use, the amount of plastic particles floating about in the North Atlantic didn’t appear to change between 1986 and 2008.   So what’s going on?

The guys at the Marine Biological Laboratory have revealed that marine microbes are quite happily gobbling a lot of it up.  So much so that a whole ecosystem – the ‘plastisphere’ exists.   This doesn’t mean we can breathe a sigh of relief and carry on disposing of plastics like it has no effect.  Tiny plastic pieces can get gobbled up by tiny critters that make up the basis of the food chain.  These are then gobbled up by larger critters, who are gobbled up by larger critters, who are…well you get the idea.  So the plastic passes up the food chain.  It also accumulates in ever-increasing amounts the higher up the food chain you go.  And don’t forget some of the compounds that make up those bits of plastic can be toxic, become toxic as the breakdown process moves along too.

The authors have written up a really nice piece in ‘The Conversation’ outlining their work.

Unfortunately you will need access (or pay) to the journal Environmental Science and Technology if you want to read the original paper yourself.
Image: Marine microplastics taken from Chesapeake Bay watershed.  Credit Chesapeake Bay Program/Flickr (CC BY-NC 2.0)